App Store Review Guidelines: Amphetamine App

January 05, 2021

/assets/img/InternalBlogGraphic_Blank.png

App Store Review Guidelines are an ever-changing document from Apple which must be constantly monitored to ensure your app is compliant. Developers may feel they are in the clear after a build is submitted and approved- especially after several releases go live with no significant changes or issues.

However, being approved previously does not necessarily mean the app will be approved forever. One developer recently saw their app, which had been live in the Mac app store for years, under threat of removal for a guideline they had never been flagged for violating before. This likely raises the question to other developers- can this happen to me, and what can I do?

What Happened?

Amphetamine is a MacOS app that keeps your Mac awake as long as the user specifies, based on times or actions. The app is free to download, and has been live with its current name and branding since 2014.

Apple’s review team did not find an issue with the app itself, but rather that its branding was in violation of App Store Review Guidelines; the branded app name and pill graphic in the icon were viewed as evocative of controlled substances. The Developer, William C. Gufstason, details the violation notice he received in a GitHub post:

1.4.3 Apps that encourage consumption of tobacco and vape products, illegal drugs, or excessive amounts of alcohol are not permitted on the App Store. Apps that encourage minors to consume any of these substances will be rejected. Facilitating the sale of marijuana, tobacco, or controlled substances (except for licensed pharmacies) isn’t allowed.

Your app appears to promote inappropriate use of controlled substances. Specifically, your app name and icon include references to controlled substances, pills.

According to Gustafson, Apple said it would remove Amphetamine from the App Store by January 12th, 2021, if the violation cited was not addressed. This would mean changing the name of the app and its branding, which is far from ideal for an app that has been established for years- including over 430k downloads, reaching top 3 ranking in its category and being featured in various publications such as Lifehacker and MacRumors, and even being featured in a Mac App Store story.

Fortunately, Gustafson was able to file an appeal in App Store Connect’s Resolution Center and the violation was removed. While no reason was given as to what triggered the violation, the app did not end up needing to go through substantial branding changes to remain live.

When App Store Review Guidelines Come Into Play

Apple’s App Store Review Guidelines usually come into play when a developer submits a new app or an update for review. The app is submitted to Apple in App Store Connect, then is either approved to go live or rejected with the guideline / reasoning in App Store Connect’s Resolution Center.

However, Amphetamine’s rejection is atypical in that it was not during a new version review, the app had been live with these updates for years. From time to time, Apple will post updates to their guidelines, which new apps must adhere to; however, no new policy around what was stated as a violation was recently added.

Apple does not necessarily need an app to be “In Review” status to accept or reject it, and may do so at any time when their team is monitoring the store. Resolution Center messages can include a range from requesting to address the issue and resubmit, to complying or being removed- which is what Amphetamine faced.

On top of knowing when rejections are most likely to occur- and that they can potentially occur at any time- developers should know what to do if they face a rejection.

What to Keep In Mind

Should a rejection occur, a developer will be notified via e-mail and in the App Store Connect Resolution Center. The Resolution Center lets developers know what they have been found in violation of, and gives them an area to respond regarding the violation.

A developer should be familiar with the what the guidelines are and regularly review them for any changes, particularly in areas pertinent to their app’s features or functionality. This will make communication about the guidelines much easier, should it be needed- but more importantly, can help a developer avoid implementing a feature or making a creative set that is in violation in the first place.

When apps are reviewed for policy compliance, an Apple’s review team makes a determination if the app is compliant or in violation of the guidelines. Some of these guidelines are fairly cut and dry. For example:

4.5.4

Push Notifications must not be required for the app to function, and should not be used to send sensitive personal or confidential information.

If the app requires push notifications to function, then it will be rejected and not approved unless this is changed.

However, there are many other guidelines that fall under a gray area and are open to the interpretation of the reviewer at Apple. One such guideline includes:

4.3 Spam

Also avoid piling on to a category that is already saturated; the App Store has enough fart, burp, flashlight, fortune telling, dating, and Kama Sutra apps, etc. already. We will reject these apps unless they provide a unique, high-quality experience.

This guideline pertains to new apps, and is up to the discretion of the reviewer at Apple. While “requires push notifications to function” is relatively straightforward and objective, “a unique, high-quality experience” is very subjective language.

These are only two examples, but the App Store Review Guidelines are comprised of both fairly objective and highly subjective rules to adhere to. New developers, and developers that haven’t given them a read in a while, should be sure to familiarize themselves with the latest guidelines.

Keep in mind that the introduction section of the guidelines state the following regarding subjective judgement calls and changes:

We will reject apps for any content or behavior that we believe is over the line. What line, you ask? Well, as a Supreme Court Justice once said, “I’ll know it when I see it”. And we think that you will also know it when you cross it.

This is a living document; new apps presenting new questions may result in new rules at any time. Perhaps your app will trigger this. We love this stuff too, and honor what you do. We’re really trying our best to create the best platform in the world for you to express your talents and make a living, too.

What To Do In Case of Rejection

Though Apple has not commented on the issue, according to Gustafson’s GitHub post, the issue appears to be a reviewer at Apple making a subjective judgement call on the app’s name and branding violating their controlled substance policy. Rather than making the changes right away, he opened up discourse with Apple to discuss the issue, and was able to talk with them over the phone about it, and the matter was resolved.

If your app is rejected, keep these items in mind:

  • Evaluate if the issue is from an objective guideline - such as a bug or new feature that was not live before and is strictly not allowed.
  • Evaluate if the issue is from a misunderstanding of a guideline - and how you can provide examples of how it is a misunderstanding in the resolution center.
  • Evaluate if the issue is from a subjective guideline - and how you can provide examples of your intent and how it is not in violation. Apple is trying to keep out developers looking to “cheat the system” and wants apps that provide a “high-quality experience”, and are open to discussion in the resolution center.

For any guideline violation:

  • If Apple does not provide screenshots of the issue and you can not find it, or if what they are citing is unclear, request them to provide screenshots and/or clarify so you can help resolve the matter.
  • Always provide a phone number that is best to reach you at for further discussion outside of the Resolution Center.
  • While “just because another app is doing it” is not a valid excuse, if you have examples of other apps that do the same thing you are being found in violation of, on top of other statements and documentation, it may help.
  • Since a violation may be a misunderstanding or a subjective judgement call, be sure to provide any documentation that could help “build your case” if there is a subjective judgement call you are being found in violation of, including how it does in fact adhere to the App Store Review Guidelines.
  • Keep in mind that while Apps (and Apple) must follow the law, that doesn’t mean legal definitions of what constitutes things like “gambling”, “safe for kids” or a “controlled substance” constitute what is allowed in the App Store. The guidelines must be adhered to here.
  • Be as concise in Resolution Center messages- brief enough to re-review quickly and comprehensive enough to get the necessary information across.

Conclusion

It’s critical for developers to have an understanding of the App Store Review Guidelines, whether it be for the build itself, the apps metadata or its creative. It’s also important to understand that some of these guidelines are open to interpretation and discussion- if Gufstafson had said nothing and complied right away, it would have been detrimental to Amphetamine’s long-established brand recognition.

The issue seemed severe at first- understandably for any developer getting a notice out of nowhere that the app would be removed- but by having a knowledge of the guidelines and working through the Resolution Center, the issue was resolved quickly.

A significant change may be needed for compliance, or a new app / new feature idea may end up being one that is not compliant. That being said, an understanding of the guidelines and how to resolve rejections can help developers work through issues like these or avoid them altogether in the first place.

Thanks

CONTACT US!


Fill out the information below and our team will get back to you right away.
@2021 Gummicube All rights Reserved